Quick news and GoV future content poll
Hey fellas,
this post was supposed to go live earlier, but then a power outage happened...
Anyway, Garden of Venus update 0.7 will launch for Level 2 patrons and above on Sunday and bring the second half - or rather the remaining 60% - of events, after 0.6.5 already brought 2 out of 5 of 0.7's events a bit earlier.
The new events will be the first solo event for Aurélie, the 4th event for Grace, a new sidegirl event (purple-haired gym girl) and some associated sandbox options.
Additionally, GoV 0.6.5 will become public on itch on Sunday as well.
We hope you'll enjoy those updates!
Now about the content poll/questionaire for GoV:
With updates 0.8 and 0.9, we want to make sure each main girl has at least 2 events, even the least popular ones.
But after that, apart from a few things we want to do no matter what, we're open to prioritize the playerbases' preferences a bit more from now on.
So without further ado,
Question 1:
Apart from a 2nd event for each girl with only 1 so far and more content for the most popular main girls (Sarah, Grace, Mia and Aurelie), what would you prefer:
More content for the less popular main girls as well, or stronger focus on adding a higher variety of new sidegirls?
Question 2:
Do you want to see relatively more 'vanilla'/balanced content like currently, or stronger focus on kinks, especially free use, exhibitionism etc.?
Question 3:
Which of these possible sidegirl types sound most interesting to you*?
- hot escorts/prostitutes, both high-class and slutty ones (we need a way to spend money...)
- curvy MILFs
- sexy/cute fictional celebrities
*Note: You're allowed to vote for more than 1, if you wish.
Note 2: How many sidegirls will be added in total, depends in part on Question 1.
Question 4:
What would be your preferred balance of events vs. sandbox?
- More focus on events
- Keep balance like it is now
- More focus on sandbox
For completeness' sake:
Over on the other subscription platform, we also asked how people feel about continuing GoV development in 2026 and beyond.
But since the response was overwhelmingly positive even there, despite being less GoV-focused than this page, we assume the overwhelming majority here would also want us to continue GoV development well beyond this year, so I guess that's case closed on this matter :)
Happy voting!
Edit: Now with actual poll, SubStar logged me out at just the wrong time and ate the poll at the last minute before...