Log infor new subscribers. What's going on here and how it works
This account contains several of our projects at once.
The first one is PestControl.
You can read more about it here.
https://subscribestar.adult/posts/2036274
In order to protect against theft, we have figured out how to make theft an irrational and extremely stupid activity. We decided that the thief should lose more and more with each theft - not only money, but also time. And we called this idea "blockchain art". We make a continuous stream of content from different projects. But each new subscriber starts moving from the first pages to the last at the pace at which we created these pages. In some projects, it is possible to move forward faster, but it will cost proportionally more. That is, if you are willing to spend only $ 3 per month, you can move at the usual speed, receiving every month as much content as we created that month, many years ago (it depends on the financing of that project in those years, mostly). If you want to move faster, you can use tariffs with x2 speeds, it will cost $ 6, but you will receive twice as much content every month.
And for those who can afford the cost of $12, the promotion rate can be x4. Guys who are ready to spend $ 100 can purchase this project in its entirety right away - it's enough to make a one-time payment through the tier function.
The first one is PestControl.
You can read more about it here.
https://subscribestar.adult/posts/2036274
In order to protect against theft, we have figured out how to make theft an irrational and extremely stupid activity. We decided that the thief should lose more and more with each theft - not only money, but also time. And we called this idea "blockchain art". We make a continuous stream of content from different projects. But each new subscriber starts moving from the first pages to the last at the pace at which we created these pages. In some projects, it is possible to move forward faster, but it will cost proportionally more. That is, if you are willing to spend only $ 3 per month, you can move at the usual speed, receiving every month as much content as we created that month, many years ago (it depends on the financing of that project in those years, mostly). If you want to move faster, you can use tariffs with x2 speeds, it will cost $ 6, but you will receive twice as much content every month.
And for those who can afford the cost of $12, the promotion rate can be x4. Guys who are ready to spend $ 100 can purchase this project in its entirety right away - it's enough to make a one-time payment through the tier function.
After receiving all the pages of Pest Control (the first generation project), you will be able to receive one or both of the second generation projects.
This is AI Art without a plot, just a set of random scenes with a focus on female or male characters. Basically it's fat fur without the vore fetish.
And/or a 3d video project with a lot of vore and fatfur fetish.
You can subscribe to one of these projects or both at once if you are willing to spend more.
The 3d video project is still in development, so you shouldn't rush to access it quickly. It will take another 2-4 months approximately, although we will try to make it faster.
The AI art project has already been launched and you can access it right now. If you have already received all the PestControl pages.
You can read more about this project here.
https://subscribestar.adult/posts/2091167
well i dont like ai and i also like vore so i like the 3d video project better
Why?
ai just steals intellectual property. all the art it's been trained on is by other people who actually made it. i was really surprised that you of all people who show so much dislike for thieves would turn around and us ai gen which steals from artists.
well.. This is a philosophical question. I also thought about it a lot and was somewhat skeptical about it, although I did not take the categorical position that "AI art is theft."
For several years, I've been watching demarches and tantrums on picture sites, Twitter, etc.
I know the history well and I know that at one time people protested against the advent of steam machines - it also deprived many people of work. People protested against electric machines a little later. They protested against the appearance of cars, cameras, and computers. People don't like it when their lives change too drastically. But what can you do - progress cannot be stopped. Even if a large group of people give up the camera, but a few people don't... then these few people will get huge benefits and benefit a lot from it. Is a camera stealing someone's property? Yes, he greatly reduced the value of artists in his time. From a prestigious profession (court artists of kings and others like that), it has descended to a more mundane profession. Does a car with an internal combustion engine violate the rights of cab drivers? To some extent, he made their lives worse, their profession and skills less valuable. But who among us thinks about this in everyday life and who is ready to give up the car and the camera in the mobile phone?
Or from electricity?
I don't think AI is stealing anyone's work. AI creates things based on some experience gained from other people's achievements. But these people have also gained their experience from the achievements of other artists. To some extent, this is the same neural network, just biological, slow and lazy. How many artists have massively painted other people's characters, TLKS, etc.? How many have studied and adopted the experience of other artists? It's ironic to say that they all stole the intellectual property of the caveman who first stained the cave wall with charcoal. Created the first drawing. He invented the color black. Should we do something about it, and does it make sense?
What about the many artists who paint one picture a month or once a year, or don't paint at all for many years? And those who died?
AI can create thousands of images per day. Yes, this is a problem for artists. And for me, as one of them. And I also hate to see how children have taught the neural network to draw my characters. And they did it badly (which is rather funny and sad). Yes, it's unpleasant for me too - to some extent. But I don't think they stole my work or any form of ownership.
I've never objected to anyone doing commissions with my characters. I'm not a Nintendo. I am against anyone stealing my work, the pictures I created over many hours of work. But if they do it themselves, why not? Let. Even if it looks disgusting and much, immeasurably worse than what I draw. I wouldn't mind even if they learned how to do it better than me. Ahaha, then I would use it myself and save myself many hours of life. I have a huge number of subjects and I would be happy to find a way to do my job hundreds of times faster. I would be able to make more content, more stories. It's good for me and for my subscribers.
Yes, due to the fact that there are 1,000,000 times more pictures around and against the background of the endless stream of neuro art, the pictures created by hands are simply lost and flash less and less often. This is one of the aspects of progress. Life is changing. Whoever manages to adapt to it will survive. The others... They'll get off this road.
Having the choice to create hundreds of pictures a day without much effort, or mess with one, spending a lot of time and effort... this is irrational. Here's a look... A PestControl type project was created entirely by hand. But this is significantly inferior to many AI images. And it took a long time. If I had only worked on this project, it would have taken at least 3-4 months to create. With the help of neurons, I could do it in a couple of weeks. And it would look more interesting and brighter. I think in the era of neural networks, not using them in your processes is just criminal stupidity. After all, they will allow you to do everything faster and better. And give subscribers more content for every dollar than slow manual labor.
I think it's justified to draw with your hands now just to train a neural network. And then dramatically speed up your work with its help. But I don't know how to train neural networks yet, although I'm going to learn. Over time. Then I could just create characters and then generate beautiful pictures with them based on a fictional plot. I think I can create a lot of good and vivid stories. Not only fetishic, but also ordinary, literary type.
Working with my hands, I couldn't make even 0.1% of these stories. Therefore, even before the advent of neural networks, I began to actively study 3d. My dream is to do animation and- because it will allow you to move through the plot faster. Without loss of quality.
I guess my thoughts are a bit muddled, I'm tired as hell after 12 hours of work. But I'll be happy to discuss this topic if you feel like it. It is interesting for me to listen to all the thoughts and arguments on this topic, it allows me to better formulate my own thoughts, develop some confidence in my own correctness, or change my mind under the arguments of the interlocutor.
At this point, I'll put it very briefly once again.:
- I don't think AI art completely destroys artists. In any case, progress cannot be stopped. If he can't be defeated, then you can lead ;) This phrase was said many years ago by a very smart man.
- I think that all artists "steal" something from others to one degree or another. Or they come up with the same idea synchronously, because their brain saw something that prompted them to the same idea.
For example, I was one of the first (about 30 years ago) to draw a fastener above the tail in the form of a strap with a button. At that time, no one drew anything like this, but many years later they began to draw this. Can this be considered "intellectual property theft"? I don't think so.
Can drawing certain shapes of eyes, ears, or stylistic techniques be considered theft of intellectual property? I don't think so. Otherwise, all the artists stole the idea of using RGB palette colors, because before them, someone came up with it first and started using it.
Is it possible to assume that an artist steals with his eyes any picture or view from the window he is looking at? After all, everything we see - movies, the view from the window, other pictures - all this affects our personal "neural network" and we copy something, willingly or unwittingly. Inevitably, even if we don't want to.
But often we want to. Many artists learn from each other. The shape of the fingers, the size of the eyes relative to the skull, and the position of the eyebrows. I can tell which artist is borrowing from the other and what exactly. No one comes up with something completely from scratch that no one has done before him. Nobody. Therefore, either no one steals anything, or everyone is a thief ;)
I adhere to the idea that theft is when someone has done a job, created a product. And as a result of the theft of this product, he lost the opportunity to earn money from this work. That is, if someone made 10 pictures and sold them, and someone stole these pictures and
began to give them away for free, then this second one stole the work of the first one and he is definitely a thief.
If someone just drew a picture with a character they liked, or reproduced the style of another artist exactly, this is not theft. This may not be a good thing from an ethical point of view, but I personally don't mind if someone parodies my drawing style. It's almost impossible to reproduce it exactly anyway. I can't paint exactly like another artist. Just like no other artist will be able to draw exactly like me. Anyway, if someone draws my characters, I don't mind. I've never objected. Although it may be unpleasant for me to see them drawn very poorly or in situations that seem vile and unsuitable for this character. That's why I personally never draw other people's characters. Even if they ask for and offer a lot of money. I'm just thinking that maybe another artist might experience some unpleasant emotions.
On the other hand, I don't see anything wrong with painting something similar, with the same style and the same coloring method. With the same proportions. AI helps to do this very quickly and much more accurately. AI is like a camera versus an artist on canvas. He's very fast. It is much more accurate. He won't be able to create something fundamentally new, but he can create very rare combinations that will seem very new. It's just a visualization tool. And there is nothing wrong or criminal in using it. In any case, many people won't stop doing it. And just abandon this tool... Well, it's like saying, "That's it, I'll never use electricity in my life. People didn't like it 200 years ago, it deprived them of their earnings! Ugh! Electricity is bad!
I think, as an artist and as a consumer of images, AI has changed the lives of artists very drastically. This is a problem. And it's inevitable. But it cannot be simply abolished, just as steam, electricity, and internal combustion engines could not be abolished.
It's a part of our lives. Progress. We need to learn how to use it and benefit from it. why not?
For several years, I used it exclusively "under the covers", without showing it to anyone. But I see that many people are trying to teach AI how to make my characters. It turns out they're disgusting and ridiculous, and I had a lot of fun with that. But I think they will succeed sooner or later. And this is one of the reasons why I think it's wrong to work on a comic book for many years, so that someone can teach AI on it and make 100 such comics in a month. I couldn't stop it, so I think it would be stupid not to use this technology. And don't do the same thing earlier and better ;)